Buffoons, Those Who Experience Seminal Emissions, and the Self-appointed Guards of the Women’s Bathhouse

Daf 20. Summary. What is the obligation toward a met mitzva–a corpse with no one to bury it? One must bury it, even if one is a High Priest who is otherwise prohibited from handling or coming into contact with a corpse. From this obligation, the gemara attempts to derive a general principle about the precedence of human dignity over Scriptural obligations but concludes that this is a unique case.

Rav Pappa asks Abaye why miracles no longer occur as they did in the time of their ancestors. Were their ancestors different in some way? Abaye replies that the ancestors were “totally dedicated to the sanctification of God’s name.” Examples are offered where human dignity is sacrificed to fulfill Scriptural mitzvot.

Mishnah. Women, slaves, and minors are exempt from Shema and tefillin, but obliged to pray, affix a mezuzah to their doorpost, and recite grace after meals.

Gemara. Women are exempt from time-bound mitzvot except for recitation of kiddush on Shabbat. The gemara seeks to determine which obligations are from Torah and which are rabbinic ordinances because one whose obligation is imposed rabbinically cannot fulfill an obligation for one who is obliged by Torah.

Mishnah. One who has had a seminal emission may “contemplate Shema in his heart” but should not recite it aloud. Rabbi Yehuda disagrees.

Gemara. Ravina says, “contemplation is tantamount to speech.” Rav Hisda disagrees.

Comments. The rabbis from the “age of miracles,” who were “totally dedicated” to sanctifying God’s name, were buffoons when it came to “supervision” of women. In this daf the first proof of their total “dedication” is an incident in which Rav Adda bar Ahava sees a gentile woman in the marketplace wearing the forbidden combination of wool and linen and, mistaking her for a Jewish woman, rips off her dress. He is arrested and fined 400 zuz. (Some miracle!)

Next we have Rav Giddel, sitting at the gate of the women’s mikvah, instructing the women how to immerse themselves. When asked if he does not “fear the evil inclination,” he replies, “In my eyes, they are comparable to white geese.”

And last, but not least, we have Rabbi Yohanan, another self-appointed guard of the women’s mikvah. He is reputed to be extraordinarily good looking and brags to his colleagues, “When the daughters of Israel emerge from their immersion, they will look at me and will have children as beautiful as I.” He, too, does not”fear the evil inclination,” because he is a descendant of Joseph– a line that transcends the influence of the “inclination.”

In the context of the bookends of this prologue and the epilogue on seminal emissions, the rabbis’ pronouncements on the exemptions and obligations of women lack credibility to this modern reader. In fact, one wonders how they ever managed to be taken seriously.

This daf is especially timely in the shadow of remarks this week by Todd Akin of Missouri. As Representative Akin sat outside the women’s mikvah telling women how to immerse themselves and imagining how handsome their sons would be, he was not alone. Among those who chose to prioritize their own understanding of Scripture over human dignity was one who said of a rape that resulted in pregnancy, “If God has chosen to bless this person with a life, you don’t kill it.” To which another (who currently happens to be our President) replied, “What I think these comments underscore is why we shouldn’t have a bunch of politicians, a majority of whom are men, making health care decisions on behalf of women.” Likewise, rabbis.

This entry was posted in Daf Yomi, Hevruta study, Talmud. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Buffoons, Those Who Experience Seminal Emissions, and the Self-appointed Guards of the Women’s Bathhouse

  1. charleshollander says:

    Are we to understand that R. Adda b. Ahaba, R. Giddal, and R. Johanan represent “the former generations [that] used to be ready to sacrifice their lives for the sanctity of [haShem]”(20a), and that we learn this from their behavior before the bathhouse? If so, it’s an extremely disappointing example of miracles. I agree, it does sound like Todd Akin.

  2. charleshollander says:

    I should mention a disadvantage I labor under from reading in the Soncino. Where Neil reads “Those who experience seminal emissions,” my text reads “A Baal Keri,” footnoted as follows: “V. Glos.” The glossary has nothing for Baal Keri; for Keri it only has “The text of the Scripture as it is to be read in places where this is not correctly indicated by the text as written.” I assume Baal Keri means one who has had a seminal emission, but there’s no way to know that from the Soncino. Ditto the censored passage a daf or two ago.

    • neillitt says:

      The association between keri and seminal emission, according to ArtScroll, is traced to Deuteronomy 23:11– “If there will be a man among you who is not tahor on account of a happening in the night . . .”

      • charleshollander says:

        Does the Talmudic usage of Baal-Keri derive from “mikreh-lailah” in Deut. 23:11? Brown-Driver-Briggs translates “kareh” as “by reason of the chance of the night”, i.e. nocturnal pollution, cf. Lv. 15:16. This makes the Soncino gloss above not only misleading but wrong. And yes, I have just ordered the Koren Berakhot.

  3. elenizl says:

    Charlie – Why not get Art Scoll?

  4. elenizl says:

    what Neil said!

  5. elenizl says:

    Charlie – Yes your understanding is correct. I might translate a Baal Keri as “a Mr. Nocturnal Emission” or even “a Master of the Nocturnal Emission”. It sounds kinda funny but it’s a translation that I think captures it all. In a free association way we also see a nod to another meaning of
    “ba-al”, namely ba-al as an idol one could worship. Similarly, male sexuality that cannot be controlled (as in a nocturnal emission) need not be turned into an idol, compelling as it can be….

    • charleshollander says:

      Thanks, Eleni. Baal is less a problem than Keri. Baal works like in Baal Teshuvah, I suppose. But Keri, if it comes from “kareh”, it’s hard to understand how Soncino could have mixed it up with Kriah, as in laining. Curious.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s